Legal Opinion

United States v. Forman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 22, 2009No. 08-2177, 08-2192, 08-2248, 08-2629, 08-3063PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Per curiam

Late last year the Sentencing Commission reduced the base-offense levels for crack-cocaine offenses and made the changes retroactive. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c); U.S.S.G., Supp. to App. C 226-31 (2008) (Amendment 706). Since then scores of convicted crack offenders have returned to the district courts to request sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). But not everyone is eligible; we have consolidated for decision five appeals, each from a denial of a motion under § 3582(c)(2), that illustrate several common barriers to sentence modification.

Section 3582(c)(2) permits a court to reduce…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Malcolm Jones WhitebirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. LiddellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Bryant LegreeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. United States v. MateoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Kevyn TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API