Legal Opinion

United States v. Webb

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 13, 2009No. 08-13405PublishedCited by 97 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Andrew Webb appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court concluded that Lee was not eligible for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2) because Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines did not lower his guidelines range. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

In December 2000, a jury convicted Webb of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than fifty grams of cocaine base and five kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride and of attempt to possess with intent to distribute…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Jerry Paul Henderson v. Donal Campbell, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, Attorney General for the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. United States v. Hung Thien LyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Tony Edward DensonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Laschell HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. People v. RouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. United States v. Charles LLewlynCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API