Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Baker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1960No. 95PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

Since Roland Cannon outlived Erastus Cannon and wife, Betty Cannon, it is only necessary to consider and construe those provisions of the deed from Erastus Cannon and wife to Roland Cannon with respect to the disposition of the property at the. death of the life tenant, Roland Cannon.

The accepted rule in the interpretation of a dieed is well stated in Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95, 92 S.E. 2d 682, by Parker, J., where he said: “From the earliest periods, and continuously to the present time, we have 'adhered to the rule that in construing a deed the discovery of the intention of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Witty v. WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Thompson v. . HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Witty v. . WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Lea Spears v. Circuit Court, Ninth Judicial District, Warren County, State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Anderson v. Jackson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Rouse v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Hollowell v. HollowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API