Geisenhoff v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiff’s husband, John Henry Geisenhoff, was in the employ of the Railway Express Agency, Incorporated, when defendant issued its Group Life Policy of Insurance No. 1112-G, effective February 1, 1987, insuring, among others, the life of plaintiff’s husband in the sum of $1,000, payable to plaintiff upon his death. Hereinafter the insurer will be referred to as the defendant, the Railway Express Agency as the company, and John H. Geisenhoff as the insured. The company employs some 12,000 persons covered by the policy. It pays the premiums monthly in advance to defendant, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Emerick v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Thull v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Magee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Colter v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walker v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967