Legal Opinion

Southern National Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 16, 2003No. 95-526CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

Defendant moved for summary judgment as to all the damages claims in this Winstar case, see United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996), and filed a motion in limine requesting the court not to consider certain documents that defendant deems additions to the expert reports that will form the basis of trial testimony. Plaintiffs opposed and cross-moved for summary judgment as to reliance damages and the proper measure of expectancy damages, also moving in limine to exclude documents and testimony that they claim constitute…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Commercial Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Columbia First Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Lasalle Talman Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API