Legal Opinion

State v. Hollos

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1944No. 4035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

In a joint indictment it was charged that the defendants, August A. Hollos and Lloyd H. Mercer, conspired to and did on April 20, 1943, perform an abortional operation upon Lucille Denesik from which she died on May 10, 1943. On trial, both were convicted and from that judgment separate notices of appeal on questions of law brought the case to this court.

The separate assignments of error, in most respects, raise the same questions. One group of these relates to the admission of evidence concerning a similar transaction by defendants, the operation of which was alleged to have taken place…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Scott v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Preston v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Curtis v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. KoukolMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CraftonOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. State v. PigottOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. State v. CraigWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Steinberg v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
  5. Steinberg v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API