Harrisburg Nat. Bank v. Geo. C. Vaughan & Sons

CODY, Justice.

This is a garnishment-after-judgment proceeding, and was before us on a former appeal; 195 S.W.2d 613.

*10The plaintiff in garnishment. recovered judgment in the main case against Claude M. Barter, doing business as Rig-a-Lite, on April 17, 1941. The contest between the plaintiff in garnishment and the bank garnishee was whether the account “Rig-A-Lite Co.,” in the bank, belonged to the aforesaid Claude M. Barter, doing business as Rig-A-Lite, or belonged to the said Barter’s father-in-law, W. A. Hausman.

The court overruled motions by the bank for an instructed verdict, made both at…