Legal Opinion

Englert v. Englert

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 18, 1994No. 07-93-0246-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

In this garnishment case, appellant Harry Englert challenges the judgment of the trial court finding him liable to appellee Edith Englert, the garnisher in the action. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment in favor of appellant.

The relevant facts are undisputed. In 1985, Richard Englert conveyed his interest in a piece of real estate to appellant, his brother, in exchange for a promissory note. The note was to be paid in monthly installments of $858.98, with the first payment due on May 19,1985, and the last payment due in 1995.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nobles v. MarcusTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mapco, Inc. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Harkey v. Texas Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Quinn v. DupreeTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rutherford v. CarrTexas Supreme Court · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Janvey v. Dillon Gage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Sterquell v. Scott, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  3. Ralph Janvey v. Golf Channel, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Twigg v. OpsahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. 24/7 Grill, LLC v. Donal S. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API