Legal Opinion
Slinker v. Jim Beam Brands Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided September 30, 2016No. Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-370-DJHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
David J. Hale, Judge, United States District Court
Plaintiff Herbert Slinker was involved in a workplace accident at Jim Beam Brands. As a result, Jim Beam required Slinker to submit to a drug test. Slinker failed the drug test and Jim Beam terminated his employment on January 6, 2014. Slinker then sued Jim Beam and his supervisor, Jim Brady, alleging age discrimination, promissory estoppel, negligent hire, and coerced waiver of statutory rights. (Docket No. 1-1, PagelD # 16) The Court previously dismissed Slinker’s claims against Brady. (D.N. 9) Jim Beam now seeks…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gilkey v. Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Murphy v. Industrial Contractors Skanska Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Sims-Madison v. Dana Commercial Vehicle Manufacturing, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020