Legal Opinion
Gilkey v. Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 16, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00568Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION WILLIAM GILKEY Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-568 PADUCAH & LOUISVILLE RAILWAY, Defendant INC. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant, Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc. (“P&L”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff, William Gilkey’s (“Gilkey”) Complaint under Rule 12(c).1 [DE 11]. Gilkey responded, [DE 14], and P&L replied. [DE 16]. This matter is ripe. For the reasons below, P&L’s motion is DENIED. Because the Court finds that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over Gilkey’s claim, the Court REMANDS this…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.