Legal Opinion

Koch v. Specialized Care Services, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 23, 2005No. Civil MJG-04-1395PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Presently pending before the Court are plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of documents and responses to interrogatories, (Paper No. 39), defendants’ motion for a protective order (Paper No. 40), and plaintiffs’ motion to compel responses to their Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) deposition notice. 1 (Paper No. 46.) The motions are fully briefed. A hearing was held on June 2, 2005.

For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART the motion to compel production of withheld documents, ordering the production of certain (but not all)…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. D.C. v. R.R.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. United Bank v. BuckinghamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  3. Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Shanghai Meihao Electric, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  4. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Ford v. NaturaLawn of America, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API