Legal Opinion
Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Shanghai Meihao Electric, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 12, 2009No. Civil AMD 05-889PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
ANDRE M. DAVIS, District Judge.
In this consolidated patent infringement action, now pending are the objections of plaintiff Levitón Manufacturing Co., Inc. (“Levitón”), to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey, who has recommended that defendant Shanghai Meihao Electric, Inc. (“Meihao”), be awarded attorneys’ fees and costs. For the reasons set forth by Judge Gauvey and stated herein, the court overrules Levi-ton’s objections and awards fees and costs.
I
On March…
2Cases cited131 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Saint-Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Ed Tobergte Associates Co. v. Russell Brands, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- Tikkun v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.