Meyer & Holler v. Ramona Village
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
Defendants appeal from a. judgment rendered against Ramona Village, a corporation, and against defendants Callahan and Boos, as stockholders thereof, in an action to recover compensation for architectural services.
Plaintiff’s employment was under a written contract in the form of a proposal made to and accepted by defendant corporation. The provisions of the contract upon which the judgment was founded and which are material on this appeal are as follows: “We will prepare preliminary plans for said building and submit them to you for your approval and upon your approval…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Denigan v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stewart v. EngelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charles E. Hoppe, Trustee of the Estate of Los Gatos Lumber Products, Inc., Bankrupt v. Emmet L. RittenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Crane Valley Land Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Crestlawn Memorial Park Assn. v. SobieskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Schroeter v. Bartlett Syndicate Building Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of Fortunato v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.