Brust v. First National Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
The plaintiffs raise numerous questions concerning the jurisdiction and the proper place of trial of the action, which will first be disposed of. The case was commenced in the civil court of Milwaukee county. The defendant made an application to that court for change of venue to Portage county, claiming that as the defendant bank' was domiciled in the city of Stevéns Point, in that county, that was the proper place of trial. This application was denied by the civil court for the reason that no statutory provision authorizes a change of venue from the civil court of Milwaukee county. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- First National Bank v. Fellows Ex Rel. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Krueger v. ChaseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Dry Milk Co. v. Circuit CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Tullgren v. KargerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. MallettWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Stewart v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Lovegrove v. LovegroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Monarch Wine Co. v. ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.