Legal Opinion
Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. Mallett
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 2005No. 2003AP1528PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.
¶ 1. Steven Thomas, by his guardian ad litem, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision1 that declined to extend the risk-contribution theory announced in Collins v. Eli Lilly Co., 116 Wis. 2d 166, 342 N.W.2d 37 (1984), to the defendant-respondent lead pigment manufacturers, American Cyanamid Co., Atlantic Richfield Co., ConA-gra Grocery Products Co., E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Comp., NL Industries, Inc., SCM Chemicals, Inc., and Sherwin-Williams Co. (collectively "Pigment Manufac*245turers"). The court of appeals concluded that because Thomas had a remedy…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Ernest Gibson v. American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Godoy Ex Rel. Gramling v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- State v. HenleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Burton v. CyanamidDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.