Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Board of Trustees

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1946No. Civ. 12932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Bernard C. Goodwin, instituted this proceeding for a writ of mandate and declaratory relief, contending that under the proper interpretation of certain provisions of the charter of Oakland, upon his voluntary resignation as a fireman, he was entitled to be repaid certain sums which had been deducted from his salary and paid into a relief and pension fund, which sums the city has retained and refused to pay to him. The trial court held that plaintiff was not entitled to the claimed refund and entered its judgment accordingly. From this judgment Goodwin appeals.

The facts are not in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sobey v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. England v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Whitehead v. DavieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Murphy v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Reclamation District No. 833 v. QuigleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conrad v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Adler v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Phillis v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Lyons v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Brummund v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API