Legal Opinion
Nicholas C. Ricucci v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 16, 1970No. 209-67PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
2Per curiam
Our original decision, 425 F.2d 1252, 192 Ct.Cl. 1 (1970), held that the plaintiff was dismissed illegally from his position as Revenue Agent, GS-11, because he was not accorded the opportunity for “oral reply” the regulation contemplated. The motion for reconsideration says that we went off on grounds not urged by the parties either before the Civil Service Commission or before us.
It is true we did not adopt plaintiff’s interpretation of the regulation lan guage, either with respect to the requirement that the person who received the oral reply be a…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Nicholas C. Ricucci v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Ernest Samuel Nossen and E. S. Nossen Laboratories, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
4Cited by6 opinions
- Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Andrew Connor v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Pascal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Peden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Andrew Connor v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.