Legal Opinion
Peden v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 19, 1975No. 174-73PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This action is brought before us on cross motions for summary judgment seeking our review of a decision by the Board of Appeals and Review (BAR) of the Civil Service Commission (CSC). Plaintiff is an ex-Govemment employee who was removed by “adverse action” and who asks the usual relief of reinstatement to the position and back pay. 28 U.S.C. § 1491, as amended. We find no triable issue of fact. The BAR decision is based on substantial evidence and is not arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law. Our review disclosed no prejudicial procedural error.
The plaintiff, Gerald J. Peden, was a GS-12…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Kalkines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Silver v. McCameyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Joseph Cohen v. The United States. John v. Coughlin v. The United States. David M. Goodman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Nicholas C. Ricucci v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nnebe v. DausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Afro-Lecon, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Wathen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Pascal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- King v. Olympic Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.