Legal Opinion

State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. Rowe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1986No. 85-2000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The initial issue presented in this case is whether an uninsured motorist liability policy clause that requires “physical contact” between the insured or the vehicle occupied by him and the vehicle of an unidentified motorist, as a condition of coverage, abrogates R.C. 3937.18 or contravenes public policy. We hold that it does not.

*145R.C. 3937.18 provides, in pertinent part:

“(A) No automobile * * * policy of insurance * * * shall be * * * issued for delivery in this state with respect to any motor vehicle registered * * * in this state unless both of the following are provided:
“(1) Uninsured…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hedrick v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Girgis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Estate of Baxter v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Girgis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API