Legal Opinion

People v. Carrieri

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard L. Buchter, J.

Recently, the Court of Appeals in People v Lee (96 NY2d 157 *308[2001]) expanded the discretion of trial courts concerning the admissibility of expert testimony regarding identification.

In the above-captioned trial, a one-witness robbery case, the defendant moves (1) for leave to call an expert witness with regard to the accuracy of cross-racial identification, and (2) for an instruction to the jury in the court’s charge, In essence, that the jury may consider the fact that the identification was cross-racial in evaluating its accuracy and the court will…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. MiddletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. Banks, New York County Courts2007
  4. People v. CarrieriNew York Supreme Court, Queens County · 2004
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API