Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 12, 2005No. 116, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

This case involves an attempted robbery in which a cross-racial identification 1 was made by the victim of two defen*470dants, Jason Mack and James Smith, as the perpetrators. The trial court denied defense counsel’s request to argue the difficulties of cross-racial identification in closing argument and to have the jury instructed concerning the cross-racial nature of the identifications. Based upon the circumstances of this case, we hold that the trial court erred in prohibiting defense counsel from commenting on cross-racial identification in their closing arguments and reverse the defendants’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Snowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dashiell v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Antilles School, Inc. v. LembachSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  4. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Donaldson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API