Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Worthy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2008No. 1 WAP 2007PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.*

In this matter of first impression, we granted allowance of appeal to consider whether the temporary suspension of a police sobriety checkpoint to relieve traffic congestion, conducted pursuant to the on-site officer’s discretion, complied with the dictates of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, as explicated by this Court’s precedent. We hold that it did and, therefore, reverse the Superior Court and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

The relevant facts of the instant case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. BlouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LucarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. GaribaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. HokeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. Hlubin, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API