Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hoke

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 2009No. 28 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

We accepted this appeal to address a single issue: whether the mandatory minimum sentencing provision of 35 P.S. § 780-113(k) applies to a conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance? The Superior Court held that this mandatory minimum sentencing provision does apply to a conspiracy to manufacture conviction. We vacate and remand.

Appellant, Brian William Hoke, Jr., was convicted of numerous charges stemming from his involvement in a methamphetamine manufacturing operation. He was convicted under the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SegidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. MikitiukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. CleggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API