Commonwealth v. Hoke
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice McCAFFERY.
We accepted this appeal to address a single issue: whether the mandatory minimum sentencing provision of 35 P.S. § 780-113(k) applies to a conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance? The Superior Court held that this mandatory minimum sentencing provision does apply to a conspiracy to manufacture conviction. We vacate and remand.
Appellant, Brian William Hoke, Jr., was convicted of numerous charges stemming from his involvement in a methamphetamine manufacturing operation. He was convicted under the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SegidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. MikitiukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. CleggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.