Legal Opinion

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Mendes

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 2008No. F052009PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J .

This is an appeal from judgment entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer, without leave to amend, to appellants’ complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief brought against respondent calf ranchers. Appellants assert causes of action for violation of Penal Code section 597t in confining animals without an “adequate exercise area,” and for commission of unfair business practices under Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. causing the consumer appellants “loss of money or property.” We find the trial court did not err; there is no…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Birdsong v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Leider v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Von Koenig v. Snapple Beverage Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API