Legal Opinion

State v. Horr

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1925No. 24,960PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

In October, 1912, in accordance with the laws of the state, plaintiff sold to defendant certain timber which was cut and rémoved, prior to June 1, 1914, by his assigns. The timber was scaled by an employe of the state, and the state auditor’s office rendered bills to the defendant, who paid the amount demanded. In 1917 it was claimed by the state that the report of the state’s scaler was false and made with the intention of concealing from the state the true amount of timber cut. In February, 1918, the state commenced actions against the defendant and his. surety to recover additional moneys…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  3. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Walker v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · 1905
  5. United States v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Susla v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API