Legal Opinion

Tinney v. Tinney

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 27, 2001No. 99-345-AppealPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOURCIER, Justice.

In this civil action, Kevin Tinney, a.k.a. Kevin Koellisch (Kevin or plaintiff), 1 appeals from a Superior Court judgment en tered after a nonjury trial on his complaint seeking partition of two adjacent parcels of land (collectively Belcourt), including one large lot (parcel 1) upon which the mansion Belcourt Castle rests and one smaller unimproved lot (parcel 2). The trial justice denied the plaintiffs claim to partition parcel 1, and voided his proprietary interest in that parcel. As to parcel 2, the trial justice upheld the plaintiffs possessory interest in it but…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. L.A. Ray Realty v. Town Council of the Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. Harris v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. Graff v. MottaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. United States v. LutzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Filippi v. FilippiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  2. Notarantonio v. NotarantonioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Lavoie v. North East Knitting, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Kurczy v. St. Joseph Veterans Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. Morra v. HarropSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API