Legal Opinion

United States v. Lutz

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 15, 1944No. 8564PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

The defendant was indicted on two counts for buying and selling Maine selected seed potatoes at prices higher than the maximum price permitted by Maximum Price Regulation No. 271 and § 4 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 904(a). Pie was acquitted on the second count for selling, but found guilty on the first count which charged him with having “bought and received” seed potatoes at prices above the permitted máximums. Defendant has appealed from the judgment of conviction and sentence.

The underlying facts giving rise to the prosecution…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Troutman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mack Daniel and Ab Daniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. LubomskiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  3. Tinney v. TinneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. United States v. Bushwick Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API