Legal Opinion
Hammond v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 20, 1970PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Proctor, J.
In this workmen’s compensation case, the sole issue is whether petitioner is entitled to recover for injuries she received when she fell at a point near her employer’s premises shortly after leaving work. Both the Division of Workmen’s Compensation and the County Court held that petitioner’s injuries were not compensable since the accident did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. N. J. S. A. 34:15-7. The Appellate Division affirmed in an unreported per curiam opinion. We granted certification. 55 N. J. 161 (1969).
The…
2Cited by47 opinions
- Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Kasper v. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUNDSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cressey v. Campus Chefs, Div. of CVI Serv., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.