Legal Opinion

O'Hagan v. Byron

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1943No. Appeal, 95PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This trespass action arose out of an automobile accident in Ohio. Two questions are presented to us on appeal by plaintiff: (1) Was plaintiff a guest as that term is used in the law of Ohio? (2) Was the jury warranted in finding negligence for which defendant is responsible in damages?

At the first trial a compulsory nonsuit was granted on the ground that section 6308-6 of the General Code of Ohio, commonly known as the guest statute, precluded recovery. On plaintiff’s motion the nonsuit was removed and a new trial granted. At the second trial the jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Bloom v. Leech, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ferrell v. SolskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Tarbet v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Naphtali v. LafazanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  5. Greene v. MorseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API