Naphtali v. Lafazan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtWenzel, J.
The only questions raised on these appeals are legal, requiring interpretation of an Ohio statute which gives an owner and operator of a motor vehicle limited exemption from *24liability for loss or damage arising from injuries to a guest while being transported in the motor vehicle (Ohio General Code, § 6308-6 [see Ohio Eev. Code, § 4515.02]).
The findings of the trial court, which are not attacked by any of the parties, are that the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Naphtali, residents of Brooklyn, New York, planned to take a trip in Mr. Naphtali’s automobile and invited defendant and his wife to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Boggs v. PlybonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Epps v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Degenstein Ex Rel. Degenstein v. EhrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Peterson v. WinnIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Coons, Richard C. v. Lawlor, Robert P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Schlim v. GauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Naber v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.