Legal Opinion

Dodge Mfg. Co. v. Patten

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 22, 1932No. 4702PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

We are first confronted with the contention on the part of Dodgo Manufacturing Corporation that venue was not laid for the jurisdiction of the court over that corporation, because neither it nor appellee is or was a resident of the judicial district of the trial court, as required by the Judicial Code, § 51 (U. S. C., tit. 28, § 112 [28 USCA § 112]), which, in so far as it relates to the instant ease, is as follows: “* * * Where the jurisdiction is„founded only on the fact that tlie action is between citizens of different Slates, suit shall be brought only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Southern Pac. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Eastman Oil Well Survey Corp. v. Lane-Wells Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Limbershaft Sales Corp. v. A. G. Spalding & Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  5. Toulmin v. James Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API