Legal Opinion

Eastman Oil Well Survey Corp. v. Lane-Wells Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1943No. L. A. 18186PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

— Plaintiff, Eastman Oil Well Survey Corporation, brought this action for a declaration of its obligations under a contract with defendant, Lane-Wells Company. The contract gave plaintiff a license to use patented methods for orienting oil wells, i.e. discovering the angle and the direction in which they have been drilled. In return, plaintiff agreed to pay a royalty representing a percentage of what it charged its clients for orienting wells. After the execution of the contract, plaintiff perfected a new method of orientation, and seeks a declaration that it need pay no royalty on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Western Union Tel. Co. v. American Bell Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  5. Volk v. Volk Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Union Oil Co. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Butt v. BertolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Stevenson v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API