Legal Opinion

Cookinham v. Cookinham

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14542PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant following an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint without leave to amend.

It is alleged in the amended complaint that on January 7, 1924, while the parties were husband and wife, but living separate and apart, they entered into an agreement settling their property rights, and that subsequently, on November 24, 1924, an interlocutory decree of divorce was granted to plaintiff, which decree approved and incorporated the provisions of the agreement. It is alleged that the final decree in the action was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Ex Parte WeilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Robertson v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Queen v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API