Legal Opinion

Tarkett, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-CV-4830PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On October 26, 1992, this court entered an Order (the “Case Management Order”): (1) denying two extensive discovery motions filed by the defendant; (2) denying in part the defendant’s motion to vacate the scheduling and discovery order setting the case for trial for November 4,1992 in order to take discovery in Sweden in anticipation of amending the answer and counterclaim to add antitrust and a theft of trade secrets counts;1 and (3) vacating in part the scheduling order of July 9, 1992, to permit limited discovery to continue until December…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Baylson v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Perkasie Industries Corp. v. Advance Transformer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. CHEMED Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Capek v. MendelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1993
  2. Nice v. Centennial Area School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Kotes v. Super Fresh Food Markets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Wilson Corp. v. State Ex Rel. UdallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API