Reid v. Cuprum SA, De C.U.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Wayne and Ann Reid appealed from a judgment dismissing their products liability action against Cuprum SA, de C.U. The Reids ask- this Court to adopt and apply the doctrine of equitable tolling of a statute of limitations to their action. We need not decide whether to adopt the doctrine, because the Reids do not meet the requirements for its application. We affirm.'
I
[¶ 2] In a complaint dated February • 6, 1996, the Reids alleged Wayne Reid was seriously injured on June 9, 1992, while properly using a defective stepladder designed, manufactured, marketed, sold, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Burr v. Trinity Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Braaten v. Deere & Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- MAGINN v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kimball v. LandeisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Riemers v. OmdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- PARACELSUS HEALTHCARE CORP., — v. PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, NEDERLAND, B v. —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Hooper Ex Rel. Estate of Clinton v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation CenterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Underwood v. Mercy Health Partners N., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.