Legal Opinion

Reid v. Cuprum SA, De C.U.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2000No. 990338PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wayne and Ann Reid appealed from a judgment dismissing their products liability action against Cuprum SA, de C.U. The Reids ask- this Court to adopt and apply the doctrine of equitable tolling of a statute of limitations to their action. We need not decide whether to adopt the doctrine, because the Reids do not meet the requirements for its application. We affirm.'

I

[¶ 2] In a complaint dated February • 6, 1996, the Reids alleged Wayne Reid was seriously injured on June 9, 1992, while properly using a defective stepladder designed, manufactured, marketed, sold, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Burr v. Trinity Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Braaten v. Deere & Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. MAGINN v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kimball v. LandeisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Riemers v. OmdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. PARACELSUS HEALTHCARE CORP., — v. PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, NEDERLAND, B v. —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. Hooper Ex Rel. Estate of Clinton v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation CenterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Underwood v. Mercy Health Partners N., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API