Legal Opinion

PARACELSUS HEALTHCARE CORP., — v. PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, NEDERLAND, B v. —

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2004No. 03-2939PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Paracelsus Medical Corp. appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment finding Paracelsus’s breach of warranty claim barred by expiration of the statute of limitations. We affirm.

I

This is a breach of warranty claim involving a Philips Integris H5000-C Cardiac Imaging Device. Philips Medical manufactured the device which was marketed and sold to Diagnostic Medical Systems, Inc. (DMS), by Philips Electronics. DMS, in turn, sold the device to Dakota Heartland Health System (DHHS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Paracelsus. Philips Medical and Philips Electronics are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,525 Juan Jaurequi v. Carter Manufacturing Co., Inc., John Deere Company Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, A.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rosetta Hillary v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Kimball v. LandeisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Diesel MacHinery, Inc. v. B.R. Lee Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re South African Apartheid LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Advanced Control Solutions, Inc. v. JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dj Coleman, Inc. v. Nufarm Americas, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
  5. Thach v. Tiger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API