Legal Opinion

State v. Canfield

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 18, 2004No. 21749-3-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

— An offender facing revocation of a suspended sentence under the special sex offender sentencing alternative (SSOSA) is entitled to the right of allocution. State v. Beer, 93 Wn. App. 539, 546, 969 P.2d 506 (1999). Because Mr. Canfield was not given an opportunity to exercise that right, we reverse the court’s revocation order and remand for a new revocation hearing.

FACTS

Michael Canfield pleaded guilty to two counts of first degree child molestation. The court imposed a sentence of 89 months. The court suspended all but six months of his confinement under SSOSA. The terms of Mr. Canfield’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. KuhnWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. State v. HappyWashington Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. CanfieldWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. CanfieldWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ParteeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API