State v. Canfield
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Allocution is the right of a criminal defendant to make a personal argument or statement to the court before the pronouncement of sentence. It is the defendant’s opportunity to plead for mercy and present any information in mitigation of sentence. Washington recognizes the right of a defendant to allocute at sentencing. However, whether a defendant who violates the conditions of a suspended sentence is entitled to allocution at a revocation hearing is a question of first impression in this court. We conclude that a defendant at a revocation hearing has a limited right to allocute. A denial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Walter BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- John Doe G v. Dep't of Corr.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. ParteeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- John Doe G v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.