Legal Opinion

City of Burbank v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1965No. Civ. 28576PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to set aside its order of May 21, 1964, denying petitioners’ motion to strike, overruling their demurrer to the complaint hereinafter detailed and denying their request to file an amended answer to said complaint.

The petitioners herein are: (1) a public agency, (City of Burbank * ) and (2) employees (city manager, public works director, assistant street superintendent) of that public agency, all of whom are being sued for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of facts hereinafter generally outlined.

The complaint was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Flournoy v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Cabell v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Widdows v. KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Loop v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API