Roerig v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cole, Judge:
So-called darthronol and heptuna capsules, exported from Windsor, Province of Ontario, Canada, were entered at Detroit, Mich., where they were classified under paragraph 28 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1001, par. 28), and accordingly wereassessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem and 7 cents per pound. The collector’s letter of transmittal, stating that “The merchandise covered by the annexed protest was classified in liquidation as Medicinal Preparation in capsules as coal tar product,” reveals that the classifying officer invoked that part of the highly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Bayer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Roerig v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Roerig v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- J. B. Roerig & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.