Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
WmsoN, Judge:
The merchandise in the case at bar, invoiced as Methylphenylethylhydantoin and hereinafter referred to as “Mes-antoin,” was classified under paragraph 28(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem and 7 cents per pound as a coal-tar medicinal, under the provision therein for “other medic-ináis.” Plaintiff claims the merchandise properly dutiable under paragraph 5 of the said act at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem as a medicinal preparation, not specially provided for. It appears that the imported product is an anticonvulsant, used in the treatment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Overton & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- McKesson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Roerig v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. W. J. Matheson & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.