Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tucker v. Frinzi

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1996No. 306A95PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

Plaintiff State of North Carolina filed this action against defendant Carl Frinzi seeking to establish paternity, set child support, and recover reimbursement for public assistance paid to support the minor child. The trial court concluded that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. For the reason discussed herein, we conclude that the doctrine of res judicata does not apply and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Lea Anna Lefeavers Tucker is the mother of the minor child, bom 19 July 1976, who is the subject of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Settle by and Through Sullivan v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Hales v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Halscott Megaro, P.A. v. Henry McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  3. State v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Williams v. PeabodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Funderburk v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API