Legal Opinion
Gruendl v. Oewel Partnership, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1997No. A073716PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, J.
In this appeal, Charles G. Oewel (appellant) contends the judgment below must be reversed because the trial court failed to issue a statement of decision under Code of Civil Procedure section 632. Appellant also contends substantial evidence does not support the trial court’s finding that appellant is the alter ego of the named limited liability defendants, Oewel Partners, Limited (OPL) and Oewel Partnership, Inc. (OPI).
The challenged judgment is an amended final judgment. Stuart J. Gruendl (respondent) moved to amend the original judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re Rose G.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Alexander v. Abbey of the ChimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Dow Jones & Co. v. AvenelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kington v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Askmo v. AskmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of San Diego v. Rancho Penasquitos PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Lien v. Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Wallis v. PHL Associates Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.