Legal Opinion

Young v. South Tredegar Iron Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1886PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. May Term, 1884. ~W. M. Bradford, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.

The subject-matter of the litigation in each of these bills is the same. The question is as to the title to thirty shares of stock in the Powell Iron and Nail Company, otherwise known as the South Tredegar Iron Company. Young claims title by virtue of an attachment proceeding in the Chancery Court of Hamilton County against ~W. H. Powell, the original owner of said shares, and under which proceeding these shares were sold and bought by him. Eox claims the same shares by virtue of a private- sale and assignment of the certificates by Powell to himself. The determination of the true title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Plimpton v. . BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Lasselle v. GodfroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1824

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Insurance Co. v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cartwright v. DickinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Peck v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API