Legal Opinion

Dugger v. Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1895PublishedCited by 36 opinions

FROM MADISON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Madison County. Albert G. Hawkins, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The defendant is a foreign insurance company, which, having complied with the requirements of Chapter 122 of the Acts of the Legislature of 1891, and, doing business in this State, delivered, in 1894, to the complainant in Tennessee the fire insurance policy in controversy. The property covered by this policy was burned while it was in operation, and the insurer declining to pay the full amount of the loss as claimed, the assured filed the bill in this cause. The defendant company admitted its liability *248for three-fourths of this loss, and with its answer tendered and paid into the lower Court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Doyle v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Philadelphia Fire Assn. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Harbison v. Knoxville Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. DAVIDSON COUNTY v. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API