Legal Opinion

Thach v. Continental Travelers' Mutual Accident Ass'n

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM FRANKLIN. Writ of error from tbe Chancery Court of Franklin County. — T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The object of this hill is to recover from the defendant association $2,000, with interest, on an accident policy issued by defendant to Dr. Stephen D. Thach, the husband of complainant. The indemnity provided by *273the policy was against death as a result of a “physical bodily injury, through external, violent and accidental means.” The policy was issued on the 18th of. June, 1898, and Dr. Thach died in Franklin county, Tennessee, October 1, 1900.

It is alleged in the bill that notice of the injury and death of the insured, accompanied by the proper proofs thereof, was given to the defendant in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Pope v. Terre Haute Car & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Life Insurance Co. v. SpratleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. BaylesTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Harrell v. American Home Mortgage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. MankinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  4. Crosby Milling Co. v. GrantTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Essenkay Co. v. Essenkay Sales Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API