Legal Opinion
In Re Sunrise Securities Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 8, 1990No. MDL 655PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
In this multidistrict litigation, 1 plaintiff the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”) 2 and third parties the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB-A”) and the Federal Asset Disposition Association (“FADA”) have moved for clarification and/or reconsideration of certain governmental privilege issues decided in my Memorandum and Order of May 31, 1989 (“May 31 Memorandum”). 3 For the reasons that follow, I will grant the motion for clarification, and deny the motion for reconsideration.
On March 25, 1988, defendants…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Vaughn v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Pennsylvania v. Navient Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Janet G. Peterson v. Meritain Health, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Gluc v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.