Hitchcock v. Skelly Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harman, C.:
This is a declaratory judgment action to construe the will of Cyrus Tobias and a family settlement agreement made thereafter. This appeal constitutes the second appearance of the will in this court (see Aten v. Tobias, 114 Kan. 646, 220 Pac. 196, wherein the will is largely reproduced).
The parts of the will with which we are primarily concerned in this appeal are as follows:
“It is my desire and Will, in which my wife, Susan E. Tobias, has expressed and does express a cordial concurrence and approval, to preserve intact the bulk, body and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bunting v. SpeekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- In Re Estate of WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Purl v. PurlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Giese v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James P. Hoffa v. Frank E. Fitzsimmons and Ray Schoessling, James P. Hoffa v. Frank E. Fitzsimmons Josephine Hoffa v. Frank E. FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- In Re the Estate of WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Schauf v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Shelby v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
- Campbell v. McBurneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.