Legal Opinion
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 11, 2010No. A09-607PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s order awarding respondent bank attorney fees incurred in a lawsuit initiated to protect the bank’s claim to property and in a separate foreclosure action. Appellants argue that the district court erred by failing to grant them a jury trial, awarding excessive fees, dismissing their claim for punitive damages, and distributing monies deposited with the court in lieu of a super-sedeas bond to the bank. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants llene and Leland Haugen owned two parcels of land in Cottonwood County (the real property), on which…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McGuire v. Russell Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Cheek v. McGowan Elec. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ransom v. VFS, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- SCHEDIN v. ORTHO-McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Storms v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011