Mullins v. Crystal Lake Park District
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
The corporate defendants’ counterclaim seeking indemnity against Stokes, a minor defendant, 1 was dismissed on the pleadings. Counterplaintiffs appeal, claiming that a cause of action was properly stated based upon the theory of active-passive negligence.
The complaint of Michael Mullins, a minor, alleged that the Park District owned land which it leased to the Junior Chamber of Commerce for the purpose of conducting a fireworks display; that on July 4th, 1967, the Melrose Corporation erected a fireworks display in conjunction with the Jaycees; that on that date the defendant Stokes stole some…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Evans Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Sargent v. Interstate Bakeries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Reynolds v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burke v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Heinrich v. Peabody International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Isabelli v. Cowles Chemical Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Sears, Sucsy & Co. v. Insurance Company of No. Amer.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Gatto v. CurtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.